...and make it snappy!

I think about photography too much. My Olympus Camedia C-310 has been a great friend and has taken a lot of good photos and a handful of very good ones. I'd decided to get an SLR, something like the Canon 350D perhaps. I want to be able to manually set speed and aperture settings, get appropriate depth of field, motion blur or freeze frame and all that jazz. And then my attention was drawn to cameras like the Olympus MJU 800, which has 8 megapixels - that's as many as SLRs like the Canon. And it's about half the price. What you'd be paying for with an SLR is adjustability and a far better lens.

Apart from the price there's the issue of What Kind of Photos do I want to take? See, what I'm thinking, apart from people snapping away at parties and on their holidays, nobody is going to be recording our lives, now, in this town. A local artist, Vince Rea, took a load of pictures of the people of Jarrow in the mid 70s, and you can get a book of the collection from the library. All of them are good pictures, none are brilliant. But the record is there. People who are old in those pictures are in the ground now. The young are middle aged. Time moves on but images freeze a frame in time.

That's what I want to do - record the world we live in now. So maybe a compact digitial camera like the MJU would be better. I mean, if you've got an SLR you've got a camera, no mistake, and people act differently around a camera, whereas they might barely notice a compact - most people have mobile phones these days, which look similar at first glance...

Any comments on this question, SLR or compact, would be appreciated.

Comments

  1. JohnSat Dec 03, 08:23:00 pm GMT

    I do miss the SLR ant the really nice and artsy pics I could take, but my compact is just too easy to slip into a pocket.

    ReplyDelete
  2. FactoBruntSun Dec 04, 05:38:00 pm GMT

    Ooh, interesting stuff!

    One aspect of it is "how much do you want to spend?".

    But, I think the most important question that you raise is "what do you want to take?". Recording the world we live in now is a great idea, and I think it could be easily achieved using both cameras you mention (don't forget the Nikon D50 DSLR either).

    From my experience I would always go with the SLR. There's lots of reasons, and none are based on the number of pixels - which is not an issue any longer. 8 megapixels is almost no increase on 6, and even 12 isn't much better than 6 - and that's because it's all a measure of area (so 36 megapixels is twice the resolution of 6 megapixels, and that's a long way off being in our everyday cameras). Image quality is based mostly on the lens quality, and SLRs have much better lenses - and even if one you buy doesn't you can always save up and buy a lens that is good quality to fit your SLR.

    Snappy pictures can be taken by snappy cameras or SLRs, but great portraits, great landscapes, etc. can only be taken on SLRs with decent lenses (in my opinion). There's no way half of my photography could be done on my wife's snappy camera (even though it was an expensive one).

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

LTPTP XXV: We Shall Overcome

Image
We shall indeed.  It's a lovely wee tune to learn.  I've almost memorized it this morning, the idea being, when I encounter a piano, I want something to sit down and play on the bugger.  I've a feeling that my keyboard's keys are lighter than a proper piano's, and there'll be a bit of effort transferring the skills I've gotten so far.  Probably, at some point this year, I'll be in workplace with a piano.  I'll print off some simple music and scales, and work at it, but it's likely to be in a public place so I want something to avoid making a twat of myself initially. It feels right that this should be the first tune I learn by heart.
Read more

Leech or flatworm? Ants and Swiss Chard

Image
For the 2nd time in a week or so, (1st time regarding dwarf beans ), I'm following Alys Fowler's advice, this time with regard to Swiss chard .  Long story short, after midsummer plants which often bolt if planted in spring will resist the impulse to do so, probably because of shortening days; (I say shortening, but in Glasgow, in July, we're still getting 18 hours of daylight).   I got a packet of Bright Lights , at a good price, (another reason to wait until July before sowing, lots of bargains, I've noticed). But where to sow them? Most of the 2nd bed is under a tarpaulin, but it wasn't quite big enough to cover the whole bed, so the last 5ft or so went under a sheet of plastic, (in the background of the photo in this post, here .) Transparent plastic was a foolish idea, weeds were growing underneath it, so I covered most of it with sheets of metal from the old shed. I decided to leave the tarp, but use the area beneath the plastic for the chard. Who-ah there
Read more

VINEGAR!

That wine I started a while back has turned to vinegar. Well, that answered questions I was asking myself back then, viz., 'Do we get vinegar flies around here?' And, 'Are all these little flies vinegar flies?' The fuckers. I thought I was being a clever recycler, not buying proper air-locks and using the old plastic-and-lacky-band method. Ah well, another step up another learning curve. Anybody need three gallons of white wine vinegar and two gallons of the impossibly exotic strawberry wine vinegar? It's been a 'business day', dealing with officials and filling out forms. Don't get me started! Alex came over tonight. He gave me the Aphonic CD (he's been in touch with them and they sent him several copies). I thoroughly approve of this new trend of bands getting their work known over the internet, by-passing (initially at least) the poisonous attentions of the music industry. Come to think of it, some of the people in that business are rat
Read more